Holdfast
DOSSIER Nº 04 · VOL. II
The widow, the iPad, and the court order
SUBJECT PEGGY BUSH · APPLE ID ACCESS
JURISDICTION CANADA
PERIOD 2015 — 2016
STATUS CLOSED
The opening

A 72-year-old widow wanted to load a card game on her late husband's iPad. The platform asked for a death certificate. Then a will. Then a court order. Then it changed its mind.

What follows is a record of what happens when a platform has no policy at all for the death of an account holder. The Bush case made international news in January 2016. The platform's published terms at the time read, in their entirety on this question: rights terminate on death. There was no procedure to navigate, only a position to refuse. It would take almost six years before that changed.

The numbers
2 mo.
Phone calls before the court-order demand
CBC Go Public, January 2016. [1]
3 docs
Submitted to the platform: serial numbers, will, notarised death certificate. Insufficient.
CBC Go Public, January 2016. [1]
0
Lines of published policy on account access after death, at the time
Apple iCloud Terms (clause D, "No Right of Survivorship"). [2]
5 yrs 11 mo.
From CBC publication to a published self-service feature (Legacy Contact, December 2021)
Apple Newsroom; iOS 15.2 release notes. [3]

ALL FIGURES PINNED TO PRIMARY OR NEAR-PRIMARY SOURCES.
SEE [1]–[3] AT THE FOOT OF THIS DOSSIER.

The chronology

David Bush died in August 2015 of lung cancer. He and his wife Peggy lived in Victoria, British Columbia. They owned an Apple desktop computer and an iPad. Peggy, then 71, had been using the iPad to play a card game her late husband had downloaded for her. The hardware passcode, she knew. The Apple ID and its password, she did not. They had been her husband's.[1]

Some months after David's death, the card game stopped working. Loading any update or making any further App Store transaction required the Apple ID password. Without it, the only path forward was to wipe the iPad, create a new Apple ID, and repurchase everything. Peggy's daughter Donna phoned Apple to ask whether the password could be retrieved or the account reset.[1]

The first call went well. An Apple representative said it would not be a problem. Donna would need to provide her father's will, a death certificate, and have her mother on the line for verbal confirmation. Donna gathered the documents and called back.[1]

The runaround

The second call did not go well. The representative had no record of the previous conversation. Donna explained again. After several further calls over a period of two months, she submitted serial numbers for the iPad and the desktop, the will leaving everything to Peggy, and a notarised death certificate. Apple told her none of it was sufficient. She would need a court order.[1]

Donna asked what level of court order. She wrote a letter to Tim Cook. A customer relations representative eventually called back to confirm that yes, this was the policy. A court order would be required, the kind of court order whose preparation could cost thousands of dollars.[1]

I could get the pensions, I could get benefits, I could get all kinds of things from the federal government and the other government. But from Apple, I couldn't even get a silly password.

Peggy Bush, speaking to CBC's Go Public unit. The remark captures the asymmetry exactly. Provincial governments, federal pension authorities, and the institutions that handled the title transfers on the house and the car had all accepted the same documents Apple had refused.[1]

The resolution

The Bushes contacted CBC's Go Public investigative unit. Once CBC contacted Apple for comment, Apple's position changed within hours. The company described the demand as a "misunderstanding," apologised, and resolved Donna's request without any court order. Apple declined to discuss its policy on these matters with CBC, either at the time of the story or in the weeks that followed.[1]

The terms governing iCloud accounts, at the time, said this on the question of death:

Unless otherwise required by law, You agree that your Account is non-transferable and that any rights to your Apple ID or Content within your Account terminate upon your death.

From Section IV.D of the iCloud Terms ("No Right of Survivorship"). The clause continued: upon receipt of a death certificate, the account "may be terminated and all Content within your Account deleted." There was no other published procedure. The court-order requirement was not in the terms; it was a position taken by individual customer service representatives, applied inconsistently.[2]

The lag

Apple announced its Digital Legacy programme at WWDC in June 2021. The Legacy Contact feature shipped with iOS 15.2 and macOS 12.1 on December 13, 2021.[3] Five years and eleven months had passed between the CBC publication of Peggy Bush's case and the platform offering an account holder a way to nominate, in advance, who could access their data after death. The feature is opt-in. It must be set up before death. It does not help anyone who has already lost the password to a deceased relative's account.

What this dossier teaches
i.

An account holder's death is not the same as an account holder's wishes. A platform that says "rights terminate on death" is solving its own legal liability, not the family's access problem. The two are different problems and need different instruments. A will, a death certificate, and a notarised letter of authority were enough for everything Peggy Bush needed except the iPad.

ii.

A platform's published policy and its frontline behaviour are not the same thing. Apple's terms did not require a court order. A series of customer service representatives did. The cost of that gap fell on the family, not the platform. Where a process is undocumented, frontline staff invent one, and the inventions are inconsistent.

iii.

Public attention is not a procedure. Donna Bush spent two months on the phone with Apple. Apple resolved her case in hours once a national broadcaster asked them about it. This is not a strategy. The next family who calls without a journalist's number gets the original treatment, not the corrected one.

iv.

Platform legacy features are useful but not retroactive. Apple's Legacy Contact, which arrived almost six years after the Bush case, requires the account holder to nominate a contact during their lifetime and to share an access key in advance. It does not solve the problem the Bush family had. It only prevents the next one, for the small fraction of users who set it up.

Sources

THIS DOSSIER USES ONLY PUBLIC-RECORD SOURCES.
NO PRIVATE FAMILY DETAIL IS REPRODUCED BEYOND
WHAT THE BUSH FAMILY THEMSELVES PUT ON THE RECORD.

Next dossier
Nº 05 · Coming soon
Back to the archive →
HOLDFAST · A NEXUS COMPANY · DOSSIER Nº 04
← Back to dossiers